Build it and they will…..subsidize it!
Experiencing Confusion
“DeMinted?”
The Founders: Mere Mortals?
What kind of men were these? Supermen? Well, from earlier interviews with Fleming and my own reading of history, I know the answer is clearly “no.”
Our founders—Washington, Hamilton, Madison, Jefferson, Franklin, Adams, and all the rest were yes—intelligent, gifted and thoughtful men. But…they were men..mortal men. And they were victims of the same frailties that afflict us all.
Arrogance, jealousy, vanity, all the faults with which we struggle, they struggled with as well.
And, if we think this nation has problems today, just think what these guys faced: fighting a revolution while the newly declared nation was divided over whether the fight was worth it. Amazingly, they survived and prevailed.
These brilliant, but flawed, mortal men became immortalized in the pages of our nation’s history.
So, as we celebrate the fourth of July, we might quietly acknowledge that even though our nation’s problems seem intractable today, they are not. And, with the efforts of mortal men and women, we will do what our founders did—survive and prevail.
I Like (M) IKE?
There is a rich tradition of former generals becoming president. The first was George Washington; the most recent was Dwight David Eisenhower, nicknamed “Ike.”
The World War II hero ran and was elected easily in 1952 and 1956. His vice-president was Richard M. Nixon. And his opponent in both elections was Adali (we’re madly for Adali) Stevenson, an Illinois governor who later became the U.N. Ambassador in the Kennedy administration.
As a child during Eisenhower’s first bid for the White House, I used to watch the new TV in our home and take delight in hearing large crowds cheer for Eisenhower. But I soon became deeply disappointed and discouraged. My mother pointed out that I misunderstood what the crowds were shouting. They were saying “I like IKE
Maye Day!
The term “legend” is tossed around loosely these days, but there are some folks who deserve the appellation. I had the great pleasure of seeing and hearing one perform last week.Singer Marilyn Maye has been part of the local music scene for decades but she continues to defy the clock, and the inexorable march of time. Age has not diminished her immense talent or her equally immense charm. She wowed the New York critics not long ago and is returning to the Big Apple for appearances this fall.To watch Marilyn perform is to watch that rarest of entertainers—an original. It also reminds us of the great gift of talent some, but not most, people receive.Talent can be developed and refined, but it can’t be taught. There’s no Marilyn Maye 101. Talent is either there or is not. Marilyn’s has been evident from the outset. On stage these days, she’s like a very hip grandma whose contemporary ad-libs are made possible by years of experience. She kids herself and her audience. But she doesn’t kid about her vocalizing. When the patter stops and the music starts, Marilyn Maye again becomes the consummate nightclub singer whose repertoire runs the gamut from Broadway to Birdland.She tells her audience she has no plans to quit singing, a comment that engenders sustained and sincere applause.Marilyn Maye’s vocal skills and stage presence are presents that keep on giving.
Parting Shots!
Heading to vacation, I’m reminded of years past when major news events took place while I was away. It’s a frustrating thing to encounter when stories you would love to talk about and hear what listeners think of them occur while you’re away from work.
In 1977, I was in San Francisco when the major Plaza flood hit Kansas City. Ditto the late 80s-early 90s when some of the countries of the old Soviet Empire broke away and history was forever changed. I was in Monterey-Carmel.
Just last year, I was lounging in Las Vegas the same week that rioters were protesting in Iran over the rigged elections, Governor Sanford of South Carolina was professing his unfaithfulness to his wife and, on the plane ride home, I learned of Michael Jackson’s death.
We’ll find out on Monday, June 14 when Scott and I return to the program if major news has again happened on my time off (how dare it?) and if history has repeated itself.
PC BS!
It strikes me as an act of absolute silliness for the Kansas City, Missouri City Council to approve a resolution calling on Arizona to rescind its anti-immigration law. It’s silly for several reasons: It resolves nothing. It has no effect or application in law. It’s none of the council’s business. It is not a reflection of the Kansas City community’s views. And, it serves to further antagonize area residents who live outside Kansas City, Missouri, and already have a less than positive opinion of its government. It’s also silly–to use that word again—that two council members have declined invitations to be on the S&P program to explain the rationale for the measure. One was a co-author, Beth Gottstein; the other, Mayor Funkhouser. The mayor’s office reported last Friday that he was “too busy” to join us for a short conversation. Odd, he’s not short of time when he wants to promote his “Schools First” initiative. Never short of time to make an hour-long monthly appearance on the program. The mayor missed a golden opportunity to enhance his re-election hopes by opposing this ludicrous idea. Funkhouser says that his experience as mayor has made him more responsive to conservative impulses. This should have been one of those times!